SC slams petitioners over 'fanciful ideas' on Rohingya deportation claims

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "SC slams petitioners over &#039;fanciful ideas&#039; on Rohingya deportation claims" has 802 words across 23 sentences, which will take approximately 4 - 7 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "SC slams petitioners over &#039;fanciful ideas&#039; on Rohingya deportation claims" was covered 12 hours ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 263 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 6 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Negative, indicating that people regard this as "bad news".

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #28746518</li><li>URL: https://encashes.beamstart.com/news/sc-slams-petitioners-over-fanciful-17474039876937</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 12h ago

SC slams petitioners over 'fanciful ideas' on Rohingya deportation claims - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

A bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh also questioned the authenticity of materials placed before it by petitioner Mohd Ismail and others and refused to stay any further deportation of Rohingyas saying similar relief was denied by the court.

It said the materials placed by petitioners appeared to be taken from social media and termed the averments of torture and deportation of Rohingyas by throwing them into sea as "mere allegations".

"Where is the material substantiating the allegations? " Justice Kant asked.